Information Design:
|
| Hari Srinivas | |
| Management Tools Series E-092. June 2015. |
| D |
|---|
Click on any of the titles for the text to be displayed below it. Click it again to close. There are currently 45 stories in this collection
The answer to the first question builds the scenario, the second understand the impacts, and third suggests action to be undertaken. GDRC's 15 programmes keep these three simple, but important questions in mind when they are being developed.
(a) localize it - i.e. scale it down to the level that it will be used.
(b) contextualize it - i.e. link it to the situation that in which it will be used
(c) customize it - i.e. manage it to satisfy the need for such information.
By doing so, the 'ownership' of information is ensured, and will better cater to the needs of the end-user at the level that he/she functions, and the decisions taken at that level.
How can awareness be built so that the right decision is taken at the right time, at the right level, by the right people? This question is constantly asked when different websites and online features are developed.
The growth and effect of an urban area should be seen not only in terms of its immediate boundaries, but also in terms of the resources necessary to sustain its population. Cities have, in effect, become a barometer of humankind's progress into the 21st century, whether this is an upward or downward trend. Focussing on urban areas helps us understand the cause-effect relationships, but also the beginnings of viable solutions.
This is the thinking that went into the setting up of GDRC's programme on Information Design. One key lesson learnt in the process of developing and maintaining GDRC has been "Info in three clicks" - the information that the user is seeking should be available within three clicks of the mouse. If not, then it is buried too deep within the website, and the user may leave the site out of frustration!
It is difficult indeed to make such categorizations, particularly with the overlap of needs and uses - practitioners can easily draw lessons from the research being done, educationists can tailor their courses with the work that practitioners are doing etc. Yet, it is a useful 'triad' that can help fill the gaps and mismatches in a programme.
Understanding how a person or an organization at the local level takes decisions and acts on those decisions is a critical starting point for GDRC's work. We then need to work backwards and see what information is needed for that decision to be taken, and how and when it should be delivered. An underlying prerequisite for this is the ability to observe ....
Hop, skip and side step is a term usually used to illustrate dodging �Efor example, of a company using a PR drive to obscure key issues and not take action on a critical environmental impact of its production process. For GDRC it has a completely opposite meaning! It is to provide critical information for decision-making that will enable entities at the local level, whether companies or communities, to hop, skip and side step over problems or obvious pitfalls, thereby avoiding or mitigating negative impacts of their activities.
In a modern world where online information access and transfer is extremely fast, coming up with appropriate and consensus solutions is just a hop and skip away, and you can also manage to side-step the problems as well!
This means that we should not bombard the user with a lot of information (much of which will not be used anyway). It has to delivered in little bits in a timely and efficient manner - so that the right action or decision can be taken.
It will be awareness, understanding and action at the local level that will eventually lead to broader global sustainability.
This explains the subtle bias towards cities and urban settlements that runs through GDRC's programmes, as well as the focus on the ordinary man-on-the-street in the information sphere programmes.
Ask the right questions in the right way, and you'll engage people; do it differently, and you'll put them off. As an ancient Japanese saying goes, everyone is a teacher and has something new to teach us, if only we ask them! And asking them starts with a question!
1+1=11 has become a guiding term for GDRC in the way it presents information in its various features, and the interconnectedness of the issues involved. And emphasize the need for us to have the skills to see such linkages.
This is a very important lesson for GDRC - to respect what its visitors already know. And to build on it, layer by layer, with new information, new linkages, new connections to other topics!
Good information design calls for the collation, packaging and display of information in such a way as to communicate and meet the needs of the user, for intended purposes. It uses effective design principles to understand the essence and meaning of the information. Information design, in fact, takes graphic design principles and applies and integrates it with text.
These are some of the questions that are covered in the cycle. Ultimately, good information management is an aid to decision-making, of understanding what and how information is used, and developing a channel to deliver it to the user. Based on a user-needs assessment, information is collated and analyzed to build patterns. The iterative process is repeated by incorporating feedback and review it until it matches the needs of the user. This is the 'Information Design Cycle'
Why GDRC? What is the attractiveness of GDRC's info for its users/visitors? GDRC provides short documents that can easily be contextualized/localized to the situation of the user. By a prudent hierarchy of topics and sub-topics, it adds an additional layer of knowledge to the knowledge already possessed by the user.
The information available in GDRC does not make you an expert, but it does make you aware of the interconnectedness and multidisciplinarity of issues - helping expand and network on related interested topics.
While we look through the opposite end of a telescope, we see a picture in long perspective �E that is information presentation has to zoom out, and so provide the 'big picture' both in space and in time. An interesting lesson in information design!
'Lack' (i.e. that which is not there) refers to a situation where the existing provisions made do not meet perceived needs of the target. Thus, the desired scenario does not exist or is not complete due to the 'lack' of certain necessities.
'Gap' (i.e. that which is insufficient) refers to a situation where the provisions made are those perceived by the target population, but are essentially insufficient or inadequate.
'Mismatch' (i.e. that which is not compatible) refers to a situation where the provisions made are incongruous to, and do not match the perceived desires/wants/needs of the target population.
The key to usefulness of the L-G-M tool lies in its simplicity, and adaptability for diagnosis and perception of a problem, and guiding corrective action.
These questions drive the way in which information is presented within the pages of GDRC's programmes and its outputs. As frequently mentioned in earlier issues of GDRC Mosaic, it will small decisions and actions, taken on a daily basis by individuals and communities, that will cumulatively help to solve global problems.
These are some of the questions that need to be asked in understanding the information life-cycle approach. Ultimately, the timeliness and currency of information - that enables the right decision to be taken at the right time at the right level by the right person - is key objective!
And hence the title of this piece. We need less of [1+2=3], i.e. whee info is fixed, specific/focused and linear, and more of [a+b=c]. i.e. where the user can put his/her own value to a and b and get as unique c. In other words, the user uses the info provided by localizing and customizing it to the scale and situation where it is to be used.
And that is the information management lesson provided by an oven - that when we look at an issue we need to look at it from different perspectives, and in a balanced, even manner. Like an oven zapping radio waves at the food from all angles, we need to penetrate the issue to assess and evaluate it from different points of view. Bon Appétit !!
AND so it should be for information design as well - a mixture of information provided should enable different impressions and inspirations in the user. Jazz uses different music beats in the same piece of music, but creating a composite whole that is pleasing and continuous. AND in information design, this is an important skill to be able to pay attention to different and sometimes out-of-sync streams of information to be able to build patterns of useful knowledge. And so the beat goes on!!
What we need is a way to search for it, a way to understand, package and use it for our needs. How important is it compared to other skills and knowledge, particularly in this information age? How do we develop information literacy? What formal and informal skills can we use for this? Interesting questions - that we hope we can explore in GDRC's Learning Lab and its programmes.
A rather negative lesson, but one worth keeping in mind so that coordination can happen. In some cases, for example in disaster management, good coordination can mean life or death. Coordination can be institutional, financial, operational or capacities - but is especially true for information needed to take action, on who is doing what and where, for how long and with whom.
There will always be problems behind the visible problems and to find a lasting sustainable solution, we need to find out what these are to attack the root causes and reasons of the end problem. And similarly we need to find solutions that can generate more solutions - one action that fosters, supports and enables more action to be taken, by a wider range of stakeholders.
This concept is something we can use in the wider world of information design too! Information overload is a reality that we face on a daily basis, requiring us to re-skill ourselves with new ideas and skills that will help us be more efficient and effective.
And one skill that can be adopted from this very phenomenon is to develop a meta-information system for our daily lives so that we can access, process and use information efficiently!
A key lesson learnt at GDRC is to keep the balance between the 'trees' and the 'forest'. It is important to help individuals contextualize their professional boundaries (and for organizations, their programme and project boundaries) - i.e. the trees - within a larger developmental perspective - i.e. the forests.
This approach is based on the belief that a bridge has to be built between those who have the information and the knowledge, and those that need it to solve the problems they face locally. Adopting this forest of knowledge to suit different trees is the key strategy used by GDRC - and hence its operating slogan - "Keeping the Forests and the Trees in View"!
Over the years, GDRC has collected more than 160 such formats. Some focus on the format of presentation, and some on the content of the message. Some use graphics to deliver the message, some use text. Some present the message in listed points or in summary/abstract format, some in descriptive/verbose format. Some formats are temporal, short-term or long- term, others atemporal. Some formats are specifically developed for online dissemination environments, others offline - still others are appropriate for both environments.
Depending on the message that is to be delivered, the medium used, the target audience, the dissemination process etc. the actual format used will vary. See the following URL for a full list of the formats. http://www.gdrc.org/info-design/continuum/continuum.html
So it is useful to keep the 'question starters' what, when, where, which, why, who, how, whether - in mind when gathering information on an issue.
There are many ways to make sure that comprehensive information is collected - and this is one fun way to ask questions (and maybe confuse the issue even more!).
This means that it becomes increasingly important for us to be able to see old issues from new perspectives. Or provide new information, skills and lessons for old problems people are still grappling with. It also means new ways of doing things to solve old shortcomings.
In the information cycle, based on a user-needs assessment, information is collated and analyzed to build patterns. The iterative process is repeated by incorporating feedback and review it until it matches the needs of the user.
The information cycle is an aid to decision-making, of understanding what and how information is used by the target users, and developing a channel to deliver it to the user.
It should make the 'a-ha' - a spark of insight and inspiration - happen for the user so that the right decision can be taken at the right level at the right time.
This goes together in providing access to pertinent and timely/useful information (i.e. the �two-in-a- bush�E. The information should add an additional layer of knowledge building on what the user already has �E
How does the user use information and for what purposes? How do we deliver information to better suit the needs of the user? How do we facilitate the construction of knowledge in the user's mind?
For this to happen, we need a Jack-of-all-Trades (i.e. a person who can understand and appreciate all the problems and issues involved - the big picture - with which he or she performs), but also someone who is Master-of-Quite-a-Few (i.e. a person who is well versed in his/her speciality and is also able to articulate it vis-a-vis the big picture), in order to address the myriad challenges of sustainability.
You cannot, for example, take a 200-page manual on environmental management to a city mayor and ask him to improve the city environment. He actually needs only a single sheet of paper with bullet points - enough to take a decision. A bureaucrat, on the other hand, needs just a little bit more - enough to make sure it is relevant, and confirms to city laws and policies/strategies. And a city engineer, of course, needs the full document and maybe more - to fully implement it.
So the basic 200-page document, in different forms, has helped different people for different purposes. This lies at the core of GDRC's capacity building policy, explained in the following page: http://www.gdrc.org/about/cb-policy.html
- Complementarity: Complementing existing global and international efforts in knowledge dissemination, and intrapolating its relevance at the micro level.
- Subsidiarity: Adopting a decentralized system of information collation. Ensuring, as a result, that users understand its use and limitation.
- Transparency: Key for INFORMAT to work is ensuring that information is available freely for all purposes and users.
- Continuity: Committing to ensure currency and accuracy of information made available, in a sustained manner.
- Economy: Collating, packaging and disseminating information that is, to the extent possible, in scale to the need, use and analyses of the problems being faced.
Based on queries received from visitors to GDRC's programme websites, it is clear that the information they found on the website helped them do their work (whether a report, a project, or a speech) better.
And so the metaphor, "Standing on the Shoulder of Giants" - implying an individual who improves his/her intellectual pursuits by appreciating and using the work done by other people in the past.
Turning the metaphor around - what information can be provided to users who can then use it to build on and improve the work they are doing? This is an important question that has guided the design of GDRC's web pages!
Cannot explain your work
To your grandmother?
Then its useless.
How do you explain a complex subject such as climate change to your grandmother? Thinking about strategic communications, and the need to target the right stakeholders, at the right level at the right time, the "grandmother" becomes a metaphor for better local action:
Presenting information in a way that the user can understand becomes very critical. An excellent example is that of a kid. In fact a kind, a young child, can be considered as an ultimate ennd-user of the information:
Using a kid as an end-user of your information has two meanings �Efirstly, it means that there is a need to explain what you are disseminating easily so that even a kid can understand; secondly, kids are our future anyway!
It may not be directly relevant to a kid - but the message should be easy enough so that even a kid can understand. And if we change the behaviour of a kid towards sustainability, we are on our way to change the family's behaviour too!
This has called for, as the saying goes, 'putting yourself in another man's shoes'. It may smell, but is an important part of responding to users informational needs.
Think as stakeholders
As humans we face complex societal problems that may require many different small solutions. What we need to learn is the ability to look at the problem from the perspective of different stakeholders �Etheir objectives, their skills and capacities, how they think, how they can contribute etc.
Think at different levels
Any societal problem requires action not just at the individual level, but also at the community level, at the city ward and city level itself. At higher levels we have the provincial and national levels, and finally the global level. This is what the slogan �Think Global Act Local�Emeans �Edifferent decisions are taken at these different levels. How do decisions change at different levels? Who takes them? What are their goals and objectives?
Think short-term and long-term
Understanding what we need to do immediately, and what we need to do later, in the long-term �Eis important. Complex problems need complex solutions that are implemented step by step: some in the short-term, some in the long-term. Separating them into short and long actions, and implementing them step by step is an important skill to solve any societal problem!
By combining these complementary lenses, we can anticipate systemic impacts, detect blind spots, and design interventions that are context-sensitive, globally aligned, and resilient - enhancing sustainability and long-term accountability. Read full doc
|
|
Hari Srinivas - [email protected]Return to the Information Design Page |

