Credit and Savings:
Cost-effective Banking for the Poor

Since the 1970s, agricultural credit
programs have been criticized for their
traditional focus -- first, for providing
credit solely for the purpose of increasing production without encouraging the
development of financial intermediary
systems for savers, investors and small
rural producers, and secondly, for using
a subsidized, non-sustainable interest
rate structure.
In response to this criticism, new
programs in rural credit have emerged.
These new models incorporate mobilization of sayings and strengthening of
local financial intermediaries.
The purpose of this article is to present implementation options that support an integrated approach to rural
financing and promote sustainability
strategies for poor rural communities.
The characteristics of these strategies
can be summarized as follows:
- Financial intermediation models
that have achieved the most successful outputs are those structured
around local initiatives. Full participation of community members in
the creation and operation of credit
programs is critical to the success
of a system of rural credit.
- Specialized local financial intermediaries have a greater probability of
understanding the rural market and
thereby offer services and products
reflecting the real needs of the target population.
- In order to, be effective, rural credit
should be integrated and not limited solely to agricultural activities, -
especially if these activities are subsistence in nature.
- At a minimum, interest rates
should cover the rate of inflation,
the increase in capital required for
subsequent loans, and the operating costs of the program.
- Savings at the local level is a
source of financing for future loans
and provides the opportunity for
program clients to liberate themselves from dependence on external resources.
RURAL CREDIT
The experience of various practitioners (ACCION, FUNDES and others)
teaches a fundamental lesson: owners of
small enterprises want credit, not donations. Subsidized loans, which rarely are
based on serious commercial criteria,
hamper clients from successfully
expanding their businesses on a sustainable basis.
Clients of rural credit realize that subsidized loan programs will not continue
for long. Therefore, when crisis occurs
either personally or within the bank, the
client decides to not repay the loan.
Subsidized credit programs give the
wrong economic signals to the rural
client in several ways:
- The credit program is not a serious
business venture requiring repayment.
- It provides a poor example of business practice for the microentrepreneur.
- It discourages savings. Clients only
make minimal savings to qualify for
loans because they are concerned
about the viability of the program
and the security of their funds.
The role of financial intermediation is
to efficiently coordinate the requirements for savings and credit. The role
of credit in this process is to promote
rapid capitalization through increases in
productivity or improvements in technology.
Different operating 'environments
determine the most appropriate credit
methodology. Informal credit is most
often used in the rural sector, and
although the borrowed amounts tend to
be small, loans are opportune in solving
problems of family liquidity at minimal
cost per transaction.
PRINCIPLES FOR SUCCESS WITH
RURAL CREDIT
Successful rural credit programs usually depend on the following characteristics:
Commitment and Training
- Group formation, training, and
commitment are essential for its
success.
- Member participation fortifies
understanding and commitment to
the organization.
- Effective preliminary training and
the requirement to save assists in
self-selection of members of the
group.
- Practical business education in
managing capital is very effective;
it is wise to begin with small, short-term loans and slowly increase
them according to experience and
need.
Administration
- Credit should not be used as an,
incentive to introduce new technologies Or for agricultural extension.
- Precise accounting control is indispensable for a credit program.
- The use of solidarity groups as a
cost effective mechanism for service delivery and repayment of
loans.
- Mobilization of savings among the
poor builds solidarity and can be
used as a basis for a self-financing
credit program.
Cost of Services
- The service provider's efficiency
and minimization of cost per transaction is more important than the
interest rate.
- The externalization or transfer of
expenses using associate or solidarity group control mechanisms
and promotion is effective in lowering program costs.
- The existence of continuous credit services and the opportunity for new loans are the best incentives for a high level of loan repayment.
Mobilization of savings
Credit fulfills its function best when it transfers and mobilizes resources within society itself. A myth exists that the majority of the rural population does not have savings. If this were true, the rural poor would have become extinct a long time ago. The rural poor, more than any sector of the society, must have liquid reserves in order to confront emergencies. The most important service that a financial intermediary can provide to the rural saver is the opportunity to hold liquid deposits that pay positive interest rates in real terms.
The mobilization of savings has several advantages for the organization
which provides financial service and for
its clients:
- Convenient sayings mechanisms
give low-income producers the
capacity to meet liquidity requirements, control their financial future,
and adapt to unforeseen circumstances in their productive activity
or at the family level.
- A history of regular savings on the
part of low income clients, and the
cash they succeed in accumulating
can serve as a valid substitute for
the requirements of traditional
guarantees required to access
loans,
- For the lending organization, mobilization of client savings can create
a significant source of new funds
for subsequent loans.
- Mobilization of savings converts
intermediaries into responsible
lenders with fiduciary commitment
to the borrowers and creates a
solid base for self-determined and
sustainable institutions.
It enables clients of the organization to develop capacity in admin-
istration.
- Mobilization of savings improves
the assignment of resources.
- It assists the producer in increasing
capital for financial independence.
- It increases the economic stability
of the family and allows the saver
to cover emergency expenses,
especially illness.
Mobilization of savings has significant, demonstrated impact. It increases
the possibility of access to formal financial institutions, arid it is the first step towards the formation of permanent
savings and credit organizations in the
deprived rural sector.
- Source:
- "Innovation and Transfer" November 1997 - Vol. 6, No.3
Hari Srinivas - hsrinivas@gdrc.org
Return to the Capacity Building Page
Return to the Virtual Library on Microcredit
|